Archive for August, 2008

Aug 24 2008

Why Is Abortion Still An Issue?

Published by James under Abortion, Politics

A comment I wrote on the last thread that I thought I’d elevate:

Abortion is still an issue because it is legalized murder. You believe that life begins at conception, then abortion ends that life. That is one reason why certain forms of birth control are avoided by my wife and me as well, because even the pill will occasionally end the life of a recently conceived embryo (baby).

You bring up several different issues, all of which are non-sequiters to the abortion is murder issue.

Abortion is a legalized holocaust of the unborn. Forty million babies have been legally slaughtered by a doctor and their own parents. Forty MILLION. Thousands of babies have died by the hands of a licensed doctor since this post was made.

And it needs to stop.

There are places in the world and there have been times past where a ruling class or those who rise up to rule decide that a class of persons has fewer human rights than others, and has carried out genocide against that class of persons. It happened recently in Rwanda, it happened in Stalin’s Russia, and it happens RIGHT NOW in the USA.

If my neighbor has a gun to my head, I really don’t think debates over whether his clothes match matter much, and likewise as long as this horrible atrocity continues in our nation I don’t think there is any other issue that compares in proportion.

And the only way it will stop is if we stop voting into office those who refuse to use that power to stop it.

8 responses so far

Aug 22 2008

Christians Who Want To Murder Babies?

Published by James under Abortion, Church, Culture, Death, Politics, Poverty

Matthew 25 Network
mission statement
The Matthew 25 Network is a community of Christians – Catholic, Protestant, Pentecostal, and Evangelical – inspired by the Gospel mandate to put our faith into action to care for our neighbor, especially the most vulnerable.

The election of our public officials, and the politics they stand for, are a reflection of our core values. We believe that those elected to public office carry an important trust, as their decisions have a profound impact on our nation and our world.

We believe that people of faith should actively participate in the political process as an important avenue for social change. We are called by our faith to engage in the world as it is, while we seek after and hope for God’s Kingdom.

Therefore, while no elected official will be without flaw, we come together as individuals to support candidates for public office who share the values of the Matthew 25 Network: promoting life with dignity, caring for the least of these, strengthening and supporting families, stewardship of God’s Creation, working for peace and justice at home and abroad, and promoting the common good. (emphasis mine)

Sounds like something we can all get behind, right?

I want to call upon all Christians to actually vote in ways that will protect those who are most vulnerable: those children who our nation allows their own parents (with the help of licensed physicians, I might add) to murder while in the womb.

If you are a part of a church whose pastor is in the Matthew 25 Network, false shepherds who want to steal money from the rich in order to pay for, among other things, the murder of the unborn children of the poor, then you need to call on these leaders to repent.

May God have mercy on those who would lead so many astray.

8 responses so far

Aug 17 2008

An Ironic Thought

Published by James under Abortion, Culture, Health Care

For those who check the “recent comments” in the sidebar, you’ll note that there’s some more comments under a previous post where I link to an article from the State Policy Network with some minor editorial at the bottom.

And as I woke up this morning I found it ironic that there are so many people who are just fine with a bunch of white, rich lawyers deciding (and limiting the choices therein) on how a woman can bring a new life into the world, but who would argue with you tooth and nail that she should be allowed to murder that child legally.

FWIW, I’m not at all disappointed that there is open discussion of these issues on my blog. One of the reasons I started the recent series on the Bill of Rights is to openly deal with the state of liberty (or lack thereof) in our nation, and the more opposing discussion I can get, the better.

“…among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” Ah but they didn’t really believe all that, did they?

No responses yet

Aug 16 2008

Very Brief Reflections on GenCon

I’m in the car (Seth is driving) on the way home from Indianapolis. I have some thoughts on the whole experience, but I probably won’t get any flesh on them, at least in written form, anytime soon. Here are some extremely brief (possibly overly simplified) reflections from my week, in no particular order:

  1. If I come again I want to figure out a way to bring more of my family, in particular my wife and oldest son. My wife because I have missed her horribly (and she, me) and three nights is just a long time to be away when I’m taking vacation. My oldest son because he missed his brother terribly and would have loved to share the experience. This, however, was Toby’s 10 year old trip and as it ought to be was just him and me.
  2. I got some good time to talk with Toby and get to know him a little better as he’s growing. And I’m looking forward to our friendship growing as I pursue things with him that he takes interest in.
  3. Everyone in the known universe is a geek. Some people are geeks about sports (quoting batting averages, etc.), some about fast engines, some about games, some about music, ad infinitum. And among different types of geeks there are geek specialties. And this week I got to see many of the sub-specialties of gamer geeks. And some of them were quite interesting, others disturbing.
  4. While I consider myself to be normal (don’t we all) I did not feel as out of place among gamers as I thought I would. Certainly there were times when I thought, “do I really belong here?” but most of the time I thought “except for some morality issues that separate us, Toby is a lot like people here.” And since I like hanging out with Toby and Seth and Ralph, there was no feeling of non-belonging despite various differences.
  5. I like playing games. I also like games to keep moving. I found myself losing patience with the slowness of moving by our opponents in the massive heroscape scenario we took part in this week. (See my FB account for some pretty cool (and some awfully taken) pictures of the event. Some of this is my need for more patience, and some of it is my desire to have things moving, and some of it is my lack of desire (possibly to a sinful extent) to stop and enjoy the moment when the next moment is more attractive to me.
  6. Gamers need Jesus. I overheard just enough conversations sitting around while Toby talked with the homestead to realize that there are hurting, self-centered people just like me that just happen to be immsersed in stuff that I am not. And in that context, Christians need to engage this subset of people who need Jesus just as we need to engage the stockbrokers who need Jesus and the street people who need Jesus and the people on our street who need Jesus.

I’m sure I”m forgetting something, but if I didn’t write this down right away I’m sure I’d forget it. I’ll close the post with a nice picture of Toby doing what Toby does well–concentrating on a visually pleasing art project. I’m thankful for this time with him.

IMG00365

One response so far

Aug 11 2008

Where Does Your Food Come From?

Health: Better Safe Than Sorry - US News and World Report
Andrew Stout’s farm in Carnation, Wash., is one of the most successful small organic farms in the country. Each week, Full Circle Farm delivers fresh lettuce, green peas, spring garlic, and spinach to 17 farmers’ markets in the Seattle area, as well as to dozens of restaurants and retailers, including Whole Foods Market. Some 2,400 boxes of produce a week go out to families who have bought a share in the farm’s riches. His customers are counting on getting freshness and taste-and also on Stout’s care when it comes to hygiene. “Bacteria exists everywhere,” he says. So he keeps the manure pile away from the packing shed, tests the water used to irrigate and wash vegetables, and keeps an eye on his workers to be sure they wash their hands. “I’m a food provider,” he says. “You want to do the absolute best that you can.”

The rapidly growing passion for locally grown produce from farmers like Stout and his wife, Wendy Munroe, is one sign of just how nervous Americans have become about the state of food on their plate.

Holy Cow! Whole Foods Linked to E. coli Outbreak - The Checkout
Whole Foods initiated the recall after Massachusetts health officials investigating a cluster of E. coli illnesses discovered all seven victims had bought meat at Whole Foods. The chain pulled ground beef from some of its stores on Wednesday. The Nebraska Beef recall was announced late Friday night.

The first article I linked to above is one I read about a year ago while in Arizona visiting my parents, the second is one I saw on my Google homepage this morning.

Food. It’s the stuff we take in that God has designed to give us energy, life, health, and enjoyment. Certainly God could have designed a “more efficient” way for us to get our calories in, but food was given for enjoyment, for feasting. And we miss it when we fast–turning us back to Him.

But food lately has become a knotty issue, as these two articles point out. Food can be dangerous. It can give death almost as easily as it brings life, because it can carry with it many dangerous things that exist in our world since the fall. Most people in our nation look for the FDA and the USDA to guard the quality and safety of the food supply. But can they? I mean, short of inspecting every single food item before it hits your grocery store, is that even possible? And what would that do to the tax cost of food? And is it even their job?

The first article talks about a growing movement of buying food that is local. Food that you know where it came from. Certainly that doesn’t eliminate safety concerns, but doesn’t it make them smaller than a federal agency ever could? In the old days people would buy meat from a butcher that they knew, who bought the meat directly from a farmer that they probably knew as well. The grocer? He carried vegetables and such from local farmers also. And so on.

Do you know where your food comes from? Have you ever asked they guy at the meat counter where those chickens were raised and what they were fed? He probably doesn’t know. (As an aside, I have had conversations with people at both Alwan and Sons and Pottstown Deli locally and I got an answer, and usually it was someplace I could find out more about if I wanted to.)

If you don’t know where your food comes from, you are at risk. Maybe not huge risk, but since the largest organic food vendor (Whole Foods Market) in the United States just had meat issues, I don’t think you can even say that buying organic makes you safer.

But if you grow your own veggies or get them from a friend or neighbor or a local farmer–they’re likely to be safer, and at least you can ask more questions about what they grew near, what fertilizer was used, etc. And if you take responsibility for your consumption purchases, you will always be better off in the long run, and safer. We buy most of our meat directly from local farmers and prefer veggies from the same, when we can get them. (Here’s a link to a video of a chicken plucker that we got to help with, and help a farmer, who gave us a sizeable chicken for our work).

And you just might help a local business thrive instead of a big box.

So if you don’t know where your food came from, think about it, and consider changing that. If you do–good job!

I’m sure I’ll have more to write on this later, but be careful what you eat, especially if you have no idea where it’s been.

No responses yet

Aug 09 2008

You Say It’s Your Birthday….

Well it’s my birthday, too, yeah.
[insert guitars here]

It is a new era.

Today was my first birthday since starting a facebook account. And because I was non-private enough (I did consider this btw) to allow my birthday to be “public” for my facebook friends, they all knew.

And so today my wall on facebook was plastered with birthday greetings from people around the world who I know, most of whom I’ve actually met IRL.

This is a blessing, to be sure. Facebook (and other tools like it) can allow us to be more involved in the lives of people we see infrequently. I have been glad for the reminders of birthdays, all of which never would have made it into my MS Outlook Calendar. I have been glad for the opportunities to wish well to friends that I don’t see (as far away as Korea!) well on the anniversary of his/her birth.

I am also glad that not all of my FB friends (not to be confused with my *real life* friends, though there is significant crossover) wished me happy birthday. At that point it would have felt like FB greetings on the birthday is somehow socially obligatory, which would make all of the greetings I received worth less somehow.

Technology can be a wonderful thing, used wisely. I pray that I will learn greater wisdom in my own use of it as I enter my 40th year.

To those of you, my wife and family especially, that made this a wonderful day: thank you. I do appreciate it. It is nice to be loved, and nice on those occasions where that love is most felt.

2 responses so far

Aug 08 2008

The First Amendment (Part I, Freedom of Exercise of Religion)

Published by James under Bill of Rights Series, Politics

Post 3 in the series. 1. 2.

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

This one might take several posts. Breaking it down:

Congress shall make no law:

  • Respecting an establishment of religion
  • Prohibiting the free exercise of religion
  • Abridging the freedom of speech
  • Abridging the freedom of the press
  • Abridging the right of the people to assemble peaceably
  • Abridging the right to petition the Government for a redress of grievances

     

“Congress shall make no law .” That means, if this is interpreted consistent with the meaning of words that we should be able to search the complete, current statutes of the United States Federal government and find no laws that attack or undermine any of these rights/freedoms. At least none that the Supreme Court did not over turn, right?

“shall make no law.”

Seems simple, doesn’t it? But alas, it is not.

Regarding the first of the prohibitions to Congress, I think they’ve done OK, in the narrow sense of the words. There is no national, state church. At least none that is called that. Congress has made no law that established a state religion.

What about the second part, “or prohibiting the free exercise thereof?” Has Congress made laws that prohibit the free exercise of religion? I believe they have. Congress has, through the Internal Revenue Code, told religious organizations that preachers cannot preach about particular issues and particular candidates, whether or not their religious views speak to them. For Christians, at least, this is problematic. Our religion informs every area of life, including the sphere of the state. We believe that Jesus is King over all nations, including ours, and that to not speak out, even from the pulpit, against tyranny is wrong. But to do so could bring the wrath of the state.

Congress also requires all employers to act as tax collectors. A church who believes that they should not do so is also punished by the state, sometimes to the point of having their building stripped away without cause.

“Shall make no law.” It’s worded as an absolute, but it has not been read that way by the court. And wait until next post when we get to freedom of speech!

One response so far

Aug 07 2008

Fascism Hitting You at….Home

Published by James under Culture, Economics, Politics

State Policy Network | Blog
“How can people believe they are free when something as intimate as childbirth is so heavily controlled by the corporate state?” Gregory asks. “Of course, we need freedom for families to make their choice among hospitals and home birth options. For a case for home birth, and against the establishment that embraces a program of processing women in labor as fast as it can through the systematic reliance on the pitocin-epidural-cesarean process, see the great documentary, The Business of Being Born.

“The artificial process of bringing on contractions, then giving pain relief, then bringing on more contractions, then resorting to cesareans when things don’t go as smoothly and quickly as desired, reminds me of the spiral of interventionism Mises described,” Gregory adds.

Another example of the nanny state and corporate welfare. Don’t let people do anything they want to if you can find another, more expensive, more highly regulated way.

My friends who have had home births (as have we) should know that the laws are in part guided by medical professionals who lobby for stricter regulations in order to protect their market share.

5 responses so far

Aug 06 2008

Instant-Messagers Really Are About Six Degrees from Kevin Bacon - washingtonpost.com

Published by James under Culture, Just A Link

Instant-Messagers Really Are About Six Degrees from Kevin Bacon - washingtonpost.com
With records of 30 billion electronic conversations among 180 million people from around the world, researchers have concluded that any two people on average are distanced by just 6.6 degrees of separation, meaning that they could be linked by a string of seven or fewer acquaintances.

I’ve heard the phrase a number of times and thought it interestingly possible. It might actually be 7 degrees (6.6), but it’s a networking phenom that reminds us that the world is smaller than it feels sometimes.

HT: Gene Edward Veith

No responses yet

Aug 05 2008

Happy Birthday, My True Love

DSC04522

 

Today is Theresa’s birthday. The Big 34. Yep. I married a younger woman. She wasn’t even 21 yet when we got married.

Theresa loves to learn. She devours books about topics that would bore the socks off me. And then she tells me about what she read and makes it interesting. Topics like the management of waste water for cities and soil conservation. I’m serious.

And today I am very thankful and glad to be married. And very thankful that after 13+ years she continues to put up with me.

Happy Birthday, my love. You continue to be my best friend and the one I most look forward to coming home to. Thank you for these years of marriage and for giving our children your love for learning new things. May you never cease to love to learn, and may we continue in our endeavors to learn to love.

No responses yet

Next »